(via christopherecclestoner)

(via mashkwi)
21 Reasons Why You Should Have Paid Attention In Science Class
1. Because you would understand what’s happening with this mercury
2. Because you would understand why the devil spawns from mercury (II) thiocyanate:
3. Because you would understand what’s happening with this electrical treeing:
4. Because you would understand why your cup of coffee just punched you in the face:
5. Because you would understand what’s happening with this magnetic liquid:
6. Because you would know that mixing liquid nitrogen with ping pong balls is a great way to pass the time:
7. In fact, just dropping anything in liquid nitrogen, especially an orange LED light, is a great way to pass the time:8. Because you would know how to never let a candle go out:
9. Because you would understand what’s happening in this jar:
10. Because you would know to stay far away from magnetic silly putty:
11. Because you would understand what’s happening with this magnet and copper pipe:
12. Because you would know what’s going on here:
![]()
13. Because you would know what’s going on with this elephant’s toothpaste:
14. Because you would know to keep your cesium far away from water:
15. And also start to find water fascinating:
16. And know never to eat with a gallium spoon:
17. Because you would know what is going on here:
18. Because you would find out how to never use ice again:
![]()
19. Because you would know the secret to unlimited salt:
20. Because you would know to keep feathers FAR AWAY from nitrogen triiodine:
21. And keep tennis rackets very close to flaming tennis balls:
*Long post I know and I’m not sorry about it because these are AWESOME!!!
lol i paid attention in science class we just had shitty teachers and were never taught things like this
I demand to know what school OP went to because this school sounds amazing
Do you realize how psychologically destructive it is to start the teaching of black history with slavery? This undoubtedly gives black children a low self esteem because now they only see their ancestors as a doomed people. Right away their morale is attacked, meanwhile fables of George Washington,Thomas Jefferson, Christopher Columbus, Abraham Lincoln largely dominate the classroom. Notable black historical figures such as Booker T. Washington, Marcus Garvey, W.E.B DuBois are virtually absent for the lessons and black history is minimized to Martin Luther King. Even Kings message is white washed to promote world wide unity and his criticism of White American is left out.
Despite the integration of schools it seems for the most part the lesson plan, one that focuses on the exaggeration of the forefathers still is segregated
The school where you are TOLD to paint on the walls: World’s first mural institute opens in Lyon France
With the majority of the world’s population now living in cities and towns a new breed of designers are coming through to help create urban settings a little more pleasing to the eye.
The world’s first ever school for mural art has opened in Lyon, the global leader in the field, in a bid to meet the demand for artworks which can transform cityscapes.
The EcholCite School of Mural Art specialises in teaching students how to create art that covers entire sides of multi-storey buildings, as seen across Lyon.
The school’s founder Gilbert Coudene said the city featured 150 murals, which had led it to become the world’s capital of the art form, attracting tourists from across the world, the BBC has reported. Mr Coudene said this had provided the spark for the school, which he hoped would pass on the knowledge of mural painting.He said: ‘We are responding to what we know to be a very strong demand all over the world to modify the way cities look, to make them more beautiful but also to create more social links through aesthetic tools, such as mural painting.’‘It all happened so quickly, thousands of years in the country then suddenly in the city, and it means in the city we focus too much on the functional and not on all the other elements, the emotional, the aesthetic, which are what make the difference between animals and human beings.’
Stella Young: Why she kicks ass
- She is a comedian and disability advocate.
- She is an Editor of ABC’s Ramp Up website, the online space for news, discussion and opinion about disability in Australia.
- She began her disability activism at 14 when she conducted an access audit of the shops in the local main street.
- She is a member of the Victorian Disability Advisory Council, Ministerial Advisory Council for the Department of Victorian communities and Women With Disabilities Victoria.
- She is a two-time state finalist in the Melbourne International Comedy Festival’s Raw Comedy competition.
- She has hosted eight seasons of Australia’s first disability culture program No Limits, which aired on Channel 31 and community stations across the country.
- She has worked with Youth Disability Advocacy Service to establish the LiveAccess project, advocating for better access to live music venues.
- She holds a degree in Journalism from Deakin University and a Diploma of Secondary Education from the University of Melbourne.
- Before joining the ABC, she worked in Public Programs at Melbourne Museum, where she taught kids about bugs, dinosaurs and other weird and wonderful things about the world.
- She was part of the global atheist convention in Melbourne during April 2012.
- Places you can find her: website, twitter, youtube, archive of ABC articles written by Stella, Don’t Look Past My Disabled Body - I Love It, Ramp Up (the website she is an editor of), Eulogy For A Wheelchair.
(via aragingquiet)
Books for mini-naturalistas!
This is wonderful! I don’t see much (good) marketed to Black children, especially Black girls. Nice series.
In Brief
A recent report on the TDSBs capital budget says that the TDSB is over spending. It doesn’t say who is overspending and reveals that the Nelson Mandela Park School in Regent Park went over budget by 8.4 Million and will be opening a year later then originally expected.
The TDSB is to further discuss the entire report at a meeting on Wednesday. 126 schoolyards are on the chopping block.
Maybe the TDSB isn’t Actually Strapped for Cash
Maybe the TDSB just isn’t being given enough money. Ever think about that? Or are we just going to pretend that inflation don’t exist and that it costs of keeping a 60 year old school open (the age of most of the schools in the TDSB) a hell of a lot more to maintain than a school that was built a decade ago and isn’t overcrowded. Of the four years I went to high school I had one text book where Nunavut was actually on the map, the rest of the text books were published in the 80s or 70s. And I went to a school that’s rated 7th in all the TDSB.
Two of the elementary schools I went to are on that chopping block Wednesday. Ancaster Public School, a school which is frequently on the verge of closure due to it’s small capacity and age and Faywood Elementary, which frequently found itself on the chopping block before the 80s when the principal at the time introduced an arts program, a program which was cut by budget in 2006. Since the loss of the arts program, Faywood has found itself on the chopping block. While the school claims to be an arts school it legally hasn’t been for 5 years.
Ancaster closed for a year and then reopened for 2008/09 school year along with Downsview Secondary School, after it needed renovations. Unlike most other schools that close for renovations, Ancaster and Downsview weren’t falling into disrepair because of aging and neglect, even though Ancaster arguably already had, I never went to Downsview so I couldn’t tell you anything about the conditions. But the reason those schools were closed for a year is because in the summer of 2008 the Sunrise Propane explosion happened and Downsview had all the windows blown out, while Ancaster essentially had it’s entire top floor covered in debris. The schools closed for the year along with Madonna Catholic Secondary and St. Norbert Catholic School. All four schools are with in walking distance of each other, with St. Norbert and Ancaster directly across the street from one another while Downsview and Madonna are separated by a plaza and an intersection.
Both Downsview Secondary and Madonna Secondary are located less then 600 Meters from the Sunrise propane factory. Ancaster and St. Norbert sit a literal three minute walk from the factory, with Ancaster being two streets down from the factory, you can see the factory from the schoolyard and when the explosion happened Ancaster got the brunt of the damage.
The repairs cost the TDSB and the Catholic school board millions of dollars. The TDSB has never bothered to peruse Sunrise propane to repay the cost of repairing damages to any of the schools. What defense does Sunrise have? “You shouldn’t have built your schools there”. No. Sunrise has no defense beyond it was an accident; so why isn’t the TDSB pressing charges. I’m pretty sure the it’s not to late to file the suit, the TDSB has evidence, Sunrise propane admits it was an accident, so what are they waiting for? Are they waiting for the statute of limitations to run out, you don’t need a law degree to know that is a terrible idea.
And then there’s Faywood. I don’t have fond memories of Faywood, I really hated it there. But that aside, the removal of the arts program really sent the school into decline and I’m not just talking about the attendance numbers. All the teachers who made it what it was are gone, the attendance has declined so much that all the classes are now split grade, the special ed program was only good in the first 3 years of it’s creation but then they let someone who didn’t know what they were doing take it over. The arts program is gone but the signs still up, people who are my parents age (56) went there. What ever renovations have been done have always remained minimal, it’s not wheelchair accessible, everyone who goes there talks about wanting to go somewhere else. It is undeniably past its prime.
People talk about Faywood like the last good year was 2003. That school essentially died in 2003. A turn over of first time principals drove away the teachers who had been there for 20 years. In the place of the veteran teachers of Faywood, came a school where teachers would teach for a semester and be forgotten by the next year. There is an entire side of what used to be the middle school hallway that is now empty because they can’t fill classrooms. adjacent to that side of the hallway is row upon row of unassigned lockers. When I graduated in the eighth grade, they attempted to deal with the schools declining attendees by dedicating an entire hallway, consisting of 5 classrooms to pre-first grade education; turning them into kindergarten classrooms. The school struggles to fill those now.
The problem with Faywood isn’t the neighborhood, the school has been there for 80+ years. The problem with Faywood isn’t Dublin or C.H. Best or any other nearby school; Dublin and C.H. Best and any other school in the TDSB for that matter have an overcrowding problem. The problem with Faywood isn’t with the kids, it’s not with the parents, it’s not even the constant turn over of teachers or the fact that the school itself predates North York School Boards amalgamation with the TDSB.
The problem with Faywood has, is the same problem that all schools in the TDSB have. No one seems to know how to manage old schools, no one is willing to update old schools and no one is willing to admit that old schools don’t fall behind that of new schools. No one is willing to face the problems that amalgamation has given us and this isn’t limited to the TDSB. While Faywood may be a perfect example of this, given that there is still signage that claim Faywood belongs to the no longer existent North York District School Board, the fact is, Faywood isn’t the only school that has been failed by the school board, and the TDSB isn’t the only school board that has been failed by the province.
All the schools that are were once Etobicoke District Schools, formally North York, East York, Scarborough, York and those that were deemed “Metropolitan Toronto” district, are all schools that the TDSB did not have to deal with before 1988. Those 7 boards amalgamated under the Fewer School Boards Act (Bill 104). In preparation of amalgamation, the TDSB closed 92 of it’s 164 schools. When Bill 104 came into play, the TDSB was expected to handle 600 and 300,000 students, and they were expected to do it on the same budget as they had when they were only running 164 schools. The fewer schools act also took the money that property tax gave the school board. The TDSV had to fight to get more money and it wasn’t easy to get the 2 Billion dollar budget they have today, that hasn’t been adjusted in more then a decade.
Between Bill 104 and today, the TDSB has been cut down from 600 schools to 558 schools. I don’t need to tell you that Toronto’s population has grown since 1988.
There are things the TDSB can do to raise money, like charging fees for parking in a school parking lot or renting out space more often then it already does. The option of taking Sunrise to court for damages would alleviate the burden a little and having co-op programs where students who want to work in the construction field renovate crumbling schools might be a good idea. But those things combined would only cut the most minimal amount of pressure from the TDSBs back.
There’s a reason the TDSB keeps cutting back. Parts of the TDSB are mismanaged but it certainly is not the only force at work. There is no possible way that a school, especially a school in one of Toronto’s poorest areas, is bankrupting the TDSB and I think who ever wrote that report knows its bullshit, they’re just waiting for Regent Park to be gentrified.
The TDSB is underfunded. It has been cheated out of funds, it’s had the rug pulled out from under its feet, its expected to handle much more then the resources provided can handle. There is no amount of fund raising an individual school board can do that will make up for the funds it is being deprived of. Every single extracurricular program in the TDSB school could be cut, there will still be no way to cover operating costs, even if you sell off parts of schools. Cutting back pensions won’t do anyone any good, closing schools will just cause more overcrowding.
There is only one solution to solving the TDSBs budget messes and that is to get the Ontario government to take responsibility.
Here are books for you to be a decent person.
Enjoy this list, I’ am not your educator but these people have taken the time to write about their personal experiences/lives/poetry/statics/facts on racism and sexism and intersectionality that is often times ignored. But simultaneously all happening at the same time in the same situation.
—————————————————————————————————————
Lies my teacher told me by James W. Loewen
Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present by Harriet A. Washington
Learning to be white by Thandeka
Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? by Beverly Daniel Tatum
Black skin, white masks by Frantz Fanon, Charles Lam Markmann
Black Looks : Race and Representations by Bell Hooks
The Bluest Eyes by Toni Morrison
The Soul of Black Folk by W.E.B. DuBois, Donald B. Gibson (Introduction), Monica M. Elbert (Notes), Monica E. Elbert (Annotations)
Ain’t I a woman: Black Women and Feminism by Bell Hooks
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa by Walter Rodney, Vincent Harding (Introduction)
Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II by Douglas A. Blackmon
Nobody Knows my name by James Baldwin
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness by Michelle Alexander
Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison
Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide by Andrea Lee Smith, Winona LaDuke (Foreword)
Looking Like the Enemy: My Story of Imprisonment in Japanese American Internment Camps by Mary Matsuda Gruenewald
Fantasies of the Master Race: Literature, Cinema & the Colonization of American Indians by Ward Churchill
Collected Articles of Fredrick Douglass by Fredrick Douglas
The Ways of White Folk by Langston Hughes
Brainwashed by Tom Burrell
Conversations with Audre Lorde (Literary Conversations) by Joan Wylie Hall (Editor)
The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes by Langston Hughes
Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Crossing Press Feminist Series) by Audre Lorde
The Black Unicorn by Audre Lorde
Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in America by Melissa V Harris-Perry
The Black Woman: An Anthology by Toni Cade Bambara (Editor), Eleanor W Traylor (Introduction) The Vintage Book of African American Poetry by Michael S. Harper (Editor), Anthony Walton (Editor)
But Some Of Us Are Brave: All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men: Black Women’s Studies by Gloria T. Hull (Editor), Patricia Bell Scott (Editor), Barbara Smith (Editor)
Yurugu: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior by Marimba Ani
Courageous Conversations About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools by Glenn E. Singleton (Editor), Curtis W. (Wallace) Linton (Editor)
The Fire Next Time by James Baldwin
Things fall of Apart by Chinua Achebe
Arrow of god by Chinua Achebe
Native son by Richard Wright
Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition by Cedric J. Robinson
The Philosophy of Alain Locke: Harlem Renaissance and Beyond by Leonard Harris
The Education of Black People: Ten Critiques, 1906 - 1960 by W.E.B. Dubois
Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880 by W. E. Burghardt Du Bois (Author), David Levering Lewis
The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter Godwin Woodson
Black Women in Antiquity (Journal of African Civilizations) by Ivan Van Sertima
Let the Circle Be Unbroken: The Implications of African Spirituality in the Diaspora by Marimba Ani (Author), Richards
Mdw Dtr: Divine Speech: A Historiographical Reflection of African Deep Thought from the Time of the Pharaohs to the Present by Jacob H. Carruthers
The Eloquence of the Scribes by Ayi Kwei Armah
Malcolm X: By Any Means Necessary by Walter Dean Myers
(via ushistoryminuswhiteguys)
U Stream VS C Stream.
Through out high school people were always really surprised when I told them I wasn’t in an advanced class. You see, at the beginning of high school, I didn’t get to pick my courses. Hell, I didn’t even get to pick which school I wanted to go to.
Like most kids with an IEP, I was given an IEP at a very young age and was constantly told that I was different. I attribute a lot of my self-doubt to the way IEP students are treated in the Ontario school system. I wasn’t allowed to go on field trips, after I got my IEP. I wasn’t allowed to take french, because my IEP. I wasn’t allowed to have a reading buddy in the 6th grade despite reading at a high school level, because I had an IEP. I was constantly made fun of, because I had an IEP.
And when it came time to pick high schools I auditioned and got into two art schools, only to be told by my special ed teacher that I was going to this school in my area, where everyone else was going. It was an academic school.
And when I got my course selection for grade 9 I had to send it through her; I had checked off my two electives as, Programing and Music. I wanted academic Geo, academic Science and for the first time a french class. She changed it before she sent it. I went into Business instead of Programing, Drama instead of Music, a GLE (a free period for extra support) instead of french, applied science and applied Geo.
I didn’t belong in applied anything and my teachers knew it. I took a summer school course every year to escape applied stream but by the time applied turned into college and academic turned into university, I still found myself in two applied courses. The two applied courses I had in grade 12 were college English (I had done university English in summer school the year before, and was really doing it because I needed one more credit) and college math advanced functions and college math data management in night school.
The one thing which is undeniable about kids in college streams, is the stigma which surrounds them. When you’ve been in a university class, its as if you can see the stigma floating from the mouths of educators and seeping into the pores of your fellow classmates in an applied class.
The school that I went to is ranked number 7 in all of Ontario. It’s a school renowned for turning out successful media moguls and business execs, Conservative politicians, doctors who get in on scholarships from the other end of the boarder, surgeons and professors. My school was what private schools aspire to be. In order to get on my schools honor roll, your average had to be a 95 or higher. This was because more then half of the school was enrolled in what’s called the MACs program, where you were a year ahead and if they didn’t keep an 80 average through out all 4 years, they were kicked out of the program which often meant being kicked out of the school.
My school was either you were overachieving or you didn’t exist.
The exception to this rule was, if you were in applied/college stream. If you were on the honor roll because you were achieving an over 95% average in the college stream, you still didn’t exist. The applied/college stream kids were looked down upon. Not necessarily by the students (although I can give you more then a few examples of people looking down at kids in the college stream) but by teachers.
It never really hit me until my last year that the kids in applied stream had been conditioned to have lower expectations of themselves. Through out high school, people were always so surprised if I said I was in an applied course. I didn’t talk like an applied kid. I didn’t write like an applied kid. I didn’t act like an applied kid.
Yet here I was, editing the MACs kids essays and helping them formulate their arguments for the law class I had been told I wasn’t allowed to take. People looked at me like I was some kind of octopus unicorn hybrid when I was “I have applied this” or “I have college that” and I really didn’t think it was a big deal until one day in my college grade 12 English class.
We were having a discussion around intelligence. We were given the question “Is intelligence learnt or inherent” to talk about in our groups. Everyone at my table said it was inherent and it was somewhat implied in the way it was decided that they themselves felt they hadn’t been given inherent intelligence. I disagreed. I said that there is more then one kind of intelligence and that some is learnt and some is inherent; algebra may not be inherent knowledge to everyone, but you can learn it. Some people may understand algebra quicker because they have certain skills that are inherent, but someone without those skills can still learn algebra by developing skills that aren’t as developed as someone who has inherent math skills.
So many people in that classroom, had never heard that. This was like, a new revelation. Because in the applied stream, in the college stream, in the special ed classes and the IEP meetings we are told about our weaknesses, we are told we need support here, but never once, in my entire time in school was I told I could be something by an educator. And neither were they.
It was then and there I realized I really was a unicorn with an octopuses body. I had been oblivious to those around me who wanted me to aim low and cover my eyes. All the sudden I was reminded that I had been published in two separate issues of Urban Voices, but teachers were still willing to insist that one of my many learning disabilities had to do with writing. I had built a set of drawers, fixed a guitar, emptied my closet then made my mattress fall out of it and nailed all the shelves in my room to the wall, but IEP still said I had bad motor skills. I had sketchbooks full of designs and still my teachers said I had limited spacial recognition. I wasn’t supposed to be good at math, but I have a math award. There were all of these things I had done just because I knew no one was going to do it for me or because I had an idea, and I never going to change anyone’s mind about my disabilities, no matter what I did.
I could write an entire novel on the subject of having a learning disability and the stigma that comes with it. It wouldn’t matter. Despite the fact, I have been told since day one of the first grade that my ADHD, the fact I read late, my bad spacial skills and my inability to stick to one task have predisposed me to failure, I don’t have any kind of higher education.
You can live with something your whole life, but someone who has studied sociology for 4 years or someone who has studied the human brain for 10 or someone who has 2 years of higher education with X amount of teaching experience, will always have more creditability then you do when they talk about the stigmas around learning disabilities and college/applied streams. They never have to walk a day in your shoes to have more credibility then you do on your own lived experiences, but maybe if they did, they would know, telling you what you can and can’t do is nothing short of disabling.
I got an 78 in a class and had to fight for it because the teacher I had didn’t like kids with IEPs and gave me a 49. This was a SAP class and she flunked every kid with an IEP. A class of Sociology, Anthropology and Psychology taught by a teacher who will flunk you on the basis of a learning disability. But that’s not even the worse part. I’m the only one of 3 kids who failed that class because of their IEP who repealed the mark. They didn’t try because they thought they couldn’t do it.
My grade 1 teacher told my parents that “your daughter should go into a field where thinking isn’t involved”. That same teacher was then allowed to run the special ed program for 12 years and told my parents in the 7th grade that she thought “your daughter is going to be a great writer”.
Having the label of an IEP has hindered me. I’m able. I’ve proved it. I’ve graduated. I’ve been on the honor roll. But everywhere I go, I will be that sped kid who can’t do things.
And it’s far worse for all those kids in the college/applied stream, who never saw they were capable of being anything more then a kid in a lower stream.
In Brief
While this years fresh faced children were playing in the summer sun, the teachers and the Provincial Ontario government were deadlocked inside a room over union contracts. The Liberal government wants to freeze teachers wages and cut benefits, in hopes of balancing the $15-Billion dollar deflect Ontario has accumulated from previous governments who refused to raise taxes but continued to spend.
The negotiations took a turn for the worst in July and continued along a very destructive path in August with the September deadline looming overhead. As a result of the short dated deadline, the Liberal government was looking for a quick solution rather then remain at the bargaining table.
Come September, the deadline had not been met and teachers returned back to classrooms while unions remained at the bargaining table.
Two weeks into September and no solution has been met for the 191,000 teachers involved; now Premier McGuinty is looking to impose a legislation called Bill 115. A bill of cuts and pay freezes, while revoking the teachers right to protest.
High school and elementary teachers across Ontario are now being asked end all extracurricular activities as of Wednesday and wear all black in protest. They are asked not to attend Monday staff meetings.
Get Your Ass In My Time Machine- We’re Going On a Feildtrip
In 1997, similar clauses in Bill 160 forced teachers to leave the bargaining table and empty their classrooms. They whispered discreetly, as teachers often do for the sake of the children’s unbiased innocence, “enough is enough”. Under the Harris government, the teachers of Ontario took to the streets, striking against a bill that would reduce education spending, raise class sizes and take rights from unions. The children of the ‘97 year would be left with a two week snow day in October, and with school daycares being held in churches we learnt nothing in our empty classrooms.
Meanwhile on Queens Park, rooms were filled to the brim with teachers and politicians were talking a lot but saying nothing of value. The politicians were looking to reduce a deflect left by previous governments (this sounds so familiar, right?), and the teachers were looking to make a living. Eventually the teachers settled on a meager plan where no one won and no one raised taxes because that would be an unpopular decision that makes sense and everyone knows elections are popularity contests.
And now here we are fifteen years later, no smarter, with more demands from the government who still wants to balance that deflect without raising taxes and unions who clearly just want fair pay, decent benefits, the right to negotiate and to keep the Ontario school system in the worlds top rankings.
It’s fair to say that this whole ordeal (both in 2012 and 1997) has put teachers, parents and students in a horrible position. The teachers clearly don’t want to strike which is why those extracurricular activities that parents rely on to keep their kids well rounded and out of trouble after school, are the first to go. The teachers want what’s best for their kids but they also have mortgages/rent, utility bills, families to feed, student loans from those university/college classes that certify one to become a teacher and all those other bills people pay.
Being a teacher is an incredibly thankless job. Most teachers are going to be teachers for a lot longer then the McGuinty government is going to be in power.
We need to ask ourselves, are we going to pressure history to repeat itself; keep in mind that a lot of Bill 160 was implemented and didn’t even make a dent in the deflect. Or are we going to stop this cycle from repeating itself again and say if you want to balance the deflect, raise taxes, stop funneling money to the corporate sector, and do a better job negotiating with the federal government so they stop loading financial burdens onto the province. We can’t let the province act like a schoolyard bully to the teachers.
In Brief
In a memo being passed around Queens Park today, our School Trustees and MPs are being told that if the teachers unions can not come to agreements with the province and schools boards it will be up to the school board to pay teachers extra money.
Surprised But Not Too Surprised
Ontario has a long history of just handing the most basic responsibilities to their municipalities at whim and saying “Here, it’s your problem now”. Biggest example, Toronto Public Housing; in the 90s the government panicked because the wait list for public housing was years long and the wait list for repairs to units that need repairing was years long and the Ontario government decided to slowly scapegoat it, putting all the responsibility on Toronto. The most ongoing example is the TTC, we aren’t subsidized as much as say Vancouver or even YRT/VIVA, yet we have high ridership and more maintenance costs. The Ontario government wanted to get into the business of selling transit to other places so they built a line of which needed special rails and cars and was not compatible with LRTs, subways or monorails and by design are very hard to maintain and are overly expensive for the quality you get from them; they called this the Scarborough RT. We all know how that worked out. No, the government pays no part for their failed experiment.
So it couldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that the government would like to load the costs of something onto a municipality.
In this situation the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) is getting screwed over the hardest. The TDSB just underwent a different contract agreement with the city due to Mayor Rob Fords obsession with the number ten. The school board received an across the line 10% cut like the rest of Toronto’s services and in the end decided to close a few schools, cut after school programs and eliminate most of (in the case of some schools entirely) their special ed programs. There is nothing left to cut from the TDSB, we are to the point where none of the textbooks I was ever assigned through out high school listed Nunavut as a territory.
There is nothing left of the TDSB, at the beginning of every school year we pay 70$ to cover activities which really should have funding from the school, but the school doesn’t even have money for decent overhead projectors and I’m talking about a school that’s listed 7th in all of Toronto.
A Two Tiered System
The other problem with Ontario’s school system is that on top of funding a public system, we are also funding a private system. While the 12 Catholic School Trustees did not receive the memo which the rest of Ontario’s School Trustees received, the Catholic System is very much a publicly funded one.
This is how out of date the provincial government has allowed our school boards to become and it’s costing us. Every other province in Canada has cut their ties with the two tiered “Catholic” “Public/historically Protestant” system. The reason for the two tiered system was that one system was an incentive to French Canadians (Catholic) and the other was for Anglo Canadians (Protestant) and the incentive wasn’t completely religious; Catholic schools were purely French speaking and Protestant was purely English speaking. Of course, the need for a purely French or a purely English school no longer the reasoning behind a two tiered Catholic-Public system, as there are public French emergence schools and most Catholic schools are like the public schools where it’s all English with a mandatory French class. The need for this two tiered system as the rest of Canada has realized, the last province to become single tiered being Newfoundland and Labrador in 1999, is no longer necessary and it’s draining the funds from public schools. Schools which openly accept GSAs to the point that it didn’t need to be legislated in.
There has not been a single debate about the school system where cutting off the Catholic system from public funds hasn’t been a topic of discussion and considering that the ever growing public school system has ever growing class sizes, often having 30 kids and over, the Catholic school class sizes tend to range from 22-25 sometimes lower, depending on the area. Meaning the Catholic system has more access to one on one help for their students and as the Fraser institute would suggest this has kids achieving more while kids in the overcrowded public system are left to fend for ourselves.
Even though most Catholic schools don’t require one to be Catholic when attending it’s kind of awkward attending a Catholic school if you aren’t Catholic.
What it comes down to at the end of the day, when we’re looking at cutting things is that we have two systems; an over crowded one which welcomes all, and a less crowded one who haven’t been so open to following the rules that Canadian society asks of our school public school system.
And if we need to pass Bill 13 becuase you don’t want to give kids in the LGBQ, Trans*, Intersex, and Gender Queer community a safe space, then you have a problem because I don’t want my tax money going to to a school that still maintains the right to allow certain student run clubs not to exist. And if I’m paying so someone else can have access to a school system where teachers aren’t overwhelmed with 30+ students, fine, but I want access to that system too and I want to get it without compromising my personal religious beliefs or lack thereof.
Maybe it’s time we looked at combining the Catholic and Public school system because either way we’re still paying for it and either way their still under the same contract and maybe this way classes will be less overcrowded and we can save a few bucks and maybe even improve the school system.
But that won’t happen because instead of looking at that, we’re just going to load more debt onto our public schools; both Catholic and Public.
Today the teachers of the TDSB in our fair city hit the streets in Toronto’s Yonge and Dundas Square. Teachers are protesting the 10% in cuts that the hamburger expert Rob Ford has imposed across the board of all Toronto services…including the Toronto District School Board.
School boards across Ontario are already struggling to meet the need of our future on a budget stretched tight as is. The cut backs to the already over crowded system, includes shrinking a special ed program that is already overwhelmed to the point at which, if you have a sever learning disability (one to the point at which a student may need a computer or a trained assistant) they are forced to go to a private school; private schools which parents often struggle to afford (side note: If I were to list to you all of the kids I have met in special ed who had to leave the public school system due to bad support, you’d have a two sided list), $50.8 million in staff cuts and cafeteria programs.




















